Kirjoittaja

Reeta Karoliina

kirjani.reeta(at)gmail.com

There's more to life than books, you know, but not much more, not much more (The Smiths)

Scars of Sweet Paradise

In general I don't like band biographies. Usually they are very badly written, boring or irritating. One of the worst I have ever read was Alice Echols' book "Scars of Sweet Paradise - The life and Time of Janis Joplin". It was really something.

I have loved Janis Joplin since I was 14 and I have always thought that she was one of the most beautiful women I have seen. So strong, so sensitive, so much of everything I ever wanted to be. But dear Alice Echols here wrote her book from different point of view. Almost every page of her book she remembered to tell reader how ugly Janis Joplin was and how much this ugliness affected her life. Janis started to sing because she was so ugly that this was her only way to get at least some good feedback. Janis drank because she was miserable and she was miserable because she was so ugly. She used drugs because she was so ugly. She never found real love because she was so disgusting. She had a low self-esteem because she was so ugly, etc... Argh! (Only reason why I ever finished that book was because I wanted to know if finally the reason for Janis Joplin's death was also somehow her ugliness...)

Ok, stupid book, but unfortunately that was not all. Saddest part of this story is that nowadays when I see pictures of Janis Joplin I somehow see what I didn't see before. I see that somehow you could call her ugly. She wasn't very thin and she had an acne. I still see the beauty of her but nowadays I see a little bit of that ugliness too. And this is why I will never forgive Alice Echols for writing that book. She opened my eyes to see something that I didn't need to see. She taught me that this is what ugly person looks like. No matter how many people loved and still love this woman. She had an acne so she was ugly. And somehow I have learned that even when I still don't accept it. And I hate that book and myself because I don't want to learn that kind of things.

Nowadays I'm trying to be careful. It's ridiculous what beauty-magazines tell us. "Big eyebrows are not beautiful." "Women shouldn't have moustache." (What about Frida Kahlo? If someone comes and tells me that she wasn't beautiful I promise, I will hit...) It's dangerous how easily others can manipulate your mind. It's especially dangerous and sad when they manipulate you to think that "beauty" has strict limits, so strict that something like this doesn't fit.

sannika kirjoitti 04.05.2007 - 13:53
In real life, only a few people are beautiful, very few ugly, and the rest of us are pretty ordinary. I wouldn't call Janis ugly either. I haven't read the book or don't know all the specifics on her life, but I think she looked the way she did because she didn't care to be traditionally beautiful. The way she looked, she could sing with all her passion, not having to remember to pose.

Your entry reminded me of another beautiful, important piece of writing: http://swirlwind.blogsome.com/2007/02/02/heavy-light/

reeta kirjoitti 04.05.2007 - 17:25
Hi Sannika and wellcome to my blog! :-)

Actually, when I start to think of it I see most of the people in this world beautiful. Of course my friends and loved ones are even more beautiful than others, but in general we are all very beautiful. Look for example these Spencer Tunick's pictures:

http://kirjani.vuodatus.net/blog/525576

Human body is beautiful and interesting no matter what shape or size it is.

But that Janis Joplin book reminded me how we can really manipulate each others. If someone keep saying to me that "small breasts are not attractive" and if he keep saying it three times a day for a year I'm pretty sure that after that year some part of me starts to believe. And isn't that exactly what magazines and advertisements are doing all the time? Every time when I (or for example whoever 10 years old girl) walk out of my door I see this one message that tells me what "beauty" looks like. No one is asking me if I want to be manipulated like that. No one asks if I want that my little sisters to be manipulated like that. But that one image is all over and that's why it's so powerfull. I was living my childhood in 80s and I remember that time we didn't have as many advertises as nowadays. Does that mean that it was at least a little bit easier to grow up then? How these little girls survive nowadays? Do they survive?

I remember when I was 15 and we had in our school our first (and only) class with title "how to read media" and it really helped me to stay more critical. Later in university women studies helped too. But still I feel that I would like to have some kind of coach reminding me to believe my own standards of beauty. And that's why I got so angry when I read that book and it coached me to exactly opposite direction.

I mean if some teenager girl want to read about Janis Joplin she probably is interested about something else than just her looks and that's why I think it's dangerous that writer only concentrates to that.

Now I have to go, I start to be too angry. Again...

And yes, Sannika, that link of yours was important blog entry.
aya kirjoitti 10.08.2007 - 16:06
hei,
mä muistaisin että sä jossain kohdassa oot puhunut tossa kuvassa näkyvästä kirjasta, siis Vigdis Grimsdottirin Z:sta (anteeksi erinnäisten heittomerkkien puute, en muista mihin ne tulee). Olen yrittänyt aloittaa sitä mutta en ole oikeen saanut otetta. Sitä on mulle kuitenkin valtavasti kehuttu. Sano, kannattaako yrittää lukea loppuun? Sitä varten siis olen kahlannut jokseenkin koko blogin tässä, enkä oo voinut välttyä kommentoimasta välillä..:) kai sä luet ne vielä jälkikäteen, tai tuleeko sulle jotenkin tieto että sinne on joku kommentoinut? mut rattoisaa on ollut! hankala keksiä parempaa tapaa viettää vikaa vapaapäivää kun kirjoista keskustellen! tosin uloskin voisi mennä kun on helle.. lähdenpä tästä!
Anonyymi kirjoitti 10.08.2007 - 17:16
Hei, kirjoitin "Z":sta täällä:

http://kirjani.vuodatus.net/blog/233817

Eli oma tarinani oli, että ensimmäisellä kerralla en kirjasta pitänyt ja toisella kertaa se kolahti. Mutta noin niin kuin yleisesti Grimsdottir on kyllä suosikkikirjailijoitani, ehdottomasti! Suosittelen muistakin kirjoja kuten "Valosta valoon"

http://kirjani.vuodatus.net/blog/241648

"Hiljaisuus", "Kannastie 7" ja oikeastaan niitä kaikkia muitakin. Ne ei ole aina kauhean helppoja, mutta usein lopussa on tyytyväinen, että luki kirjan. Esim. toi "Hiljaisuus" on tosi paksu ja välillä tylsä, mutta lopussa oikein hyytävä. Mutta lue toki! Ne on aika erilaisia keskenään, joten jos et jostakin tykkää saatat tykätä niistä muista kuitenkin.

Grimsdottirilla on kieli hirveän kaunista ja pieniä selkeitä oivalluksia tekstin lomassa. Viisas nainen.

Ja juu, saan tiedon uusista kommenteista, joten vanhojakin tekstejä saa kommentoida :-) Ihanaa jos täällä on ollut rattoisaa!
Nimesi
Sähköpostiosoitteesi (ei näytetä yleisesti)
Kotisivusi osoite
Muista tietoni selaimen evästeessä seuraavia kommentointeja varten
Seuraa tähän kirjoitukseen tulevia kommentteja (mikä tämä on?)
Kommentti
Voit käyttää kommenteissasi seuraavia HTML-elementtejä: a, b, i, u, code